Thursday, January 19, 2012

Don't you feel some things about zodiac signs are stereotyped and sound too general?

ok, i read descriptions of many signs, but sometimes find them too general and stereotyped. For instance, stubborn is the word used almost for most zodiac signs. and those are taurus, scorpio, virgo, cancer and capricorn. also it seems according to astologers almost all signs are unfaithful....example: pisces, sags, leos, aries, scorpio, aquarius, libra, gemini. if this was really true none of these signs would have ever had anything called lasting marriage. whats your opinion?Don't you feel some things about zodiac signs are stereotyped and sound too general?
"Libras, Pisces, Taurus and Cancer are the nicest people you'll ever meet."

"Aquariuses are all loyal, friendly, unbiased/non-prejudicial, idealistic humanitarians"



^ROFLMAO



"Geminis are fickle" I never experienced this.



...There's always exceptions.Don't you feel some things about zodiac signs are stereotyped and sound too general?
bullcrappp to the girl above me.... pisces are not the nicest if anything they are the most sentimental outta the bunch.... you hurt their feelings the slightest way possible and they hold a grudge for you even if they don't tell your but there emotions will for thir next 7 lives!!!......... p.s gemini are not fickle they are just ingeniously seductive!...... bad rep is all i met two of them guy and girl great lads!Don't you feel some things about zodiac signs are stereotyped and sound too general?
Astrology is not about absolutes. There are 10 planets, 12 signs, 12 houses, all working within the framework of one person. How the planets interact with each other, how the signs act within the wheel of the houses, what the influences of the planets in the signs in the houses are, the combinations are unlimited! To describe someone astrologically all these parts must be synthesized. How can that be a stereotype?

No comments:

Post a Comment